• Home
  • About ‘NewsMom’
    • Contact NewsMom
  • NewsMom News
    • Reporters’ Notebook
    • Interesting Headlines
  • NewsMom Features
    • The Lighter Side: Blogs & Reviews
    • In Depth: Editorials & Commentary
    • NewsMom Investigates
      • Preventing Child ID Theft: Child Credit Freeze How-To
      • Toxic Safety: Car Seat Chemicals
  • Research & Resources
    • Continuing Coverage
      • Car Seat Safety
      • Chemicals & Kids
      • Our Wireless World
      • Travel With Toddlers
        • 10 Must-Haves for Travel With Toddlers
    • Tips, Tricks & Fun Stuff
      • Parenting ‘VineDeas’
    • How To Test For Toxins
  • Reviews & Buying Guides
    • Reviews
    • Buying Guides
    • 10 Must-Haves for Travel With Toddlers

'Real News' & Research For Parents, By Parents Who Are 'Real Reporters'

  • NewsMom Topics:
  • Time & Money
  • Warnings & Scams
  • Health & Safety
  • Lifestyle & Reviews
You are here: Home / NewsMom News / In The News #ReportersNotebook / Remember ‘That’ Biomonitoring Study? Car Seats Are Just the Beginning…

Remember ‘That’ Biomonitoring Study? Car Seats Are Just the Beginning…

July 30, 2016 By Julie Watts 2 Comments

If you’ve seen my coverage of chemicals in car seats, you likely know that a biomonitoring study found high levels of a known “cancer-causing flame retardant” in my child; the same flame retardant was in her car seat.

ALSO SEE: How I Found “Cancer-Causing” Flame Retardants In My Child & Car Seat

The study, conducted by the Environmental Working Group and Duke University, actually had nothing to do with car seats. However, due to an embargo, I have only been able to disclose my child’s results—until now.

Flame Retardant Regulations Blamed For Increasing Chemicals in Kids’ Bodies

(KPIX 5) — Just weeks after congress passed a law giving the Environmental Protection Agency more power to ban harmful chemicals; a new study demonstrates just how much chemical regulations can impact the health of our nation’s youth.

From couch cushions, to baby products, to kid’s pajamas, chemical flame retardants are widely used in consumer goods. As a result, the average American infant has the highest recorded levels of these chemicals in their body. However, a peer-reviewed bio-monitoring study by the Environmental Working Group found that government regulations can increase those “potentially harmful exposures.”

Continue reading at CBSSF.com … 

The Backstory

About a year ago, I heard about a biomonitoring study that was testing the levels of concerning flame retardant chemicals in the bodies of mother-child pairs.

I’m not a particularly “green mom,” but as a result of my reporting on flame retardants, I’d made a significant effort to reduce my child’s exposure to the chemicals. So, when this study came up, I thought it would be an interesting experiment to see if her levels were lower than the average child.

I figured it would be an ironic twist if my efforts had little impact because… well… chemicals are in everything.

ALSO SEE: Chemicals are in everything, why should I care?

I could write an entire sidebar about how difficult it is to get a urine sample from an 11-month old, but I will spare you the details. Let’s just say, after several messy mishaps and a series of test kits, I was second guessing my decision.

I ultimately collected and submitted the necessary samples, then forgot about the study until I received our results months later.

I never imagined that my daughter’s results would ultimately lead to a national KPIX investigation “exposing alleged false advertising, apparent legal loopholes and outdated federal regulations that systematically expose millions of children to concerning, even known-cancer-causing, chemicals in their car seats.”

#Toxic Safety: Car Seat Chemicals Continuing Coverage

Toxic Safety: Car Seat Flame Retardants

Continuing Coverage:A child’s car seat is the only consumer product that is required by law in all 50 states. Car seats are crucial to keeping children safe in the car. However, critics argue that a … [Read More...]

The EWG-Duke Study

Unrelated to our ‘Toxic Safety’ investigation, EWG and Duke University tested 28 mothers and 33 children in California for the metabolites of some of the most concerning flame retardant chemicals. My daughter and I were among the study participants. They then compared those results to mother-child pairs previously tested in New jersey.

Ultimately, the EWG-Duke study concluded that “misguided government regulations” are unnecessarily increasing “potentially harmful exposures” to flame retardants.

Specifically, they found that kids in California had much higher levels of concerning flame retardant chemicals in their bodies than kids in New Jersey. One of the chemicals they tested for is known to cause cancer in animals. Another chemical is a suspected endocrine-disruptor that may affect the way our bodies control fat metabolism.

The study linked the increased levels in California kids to a 1970s California flammability regulation that prompted manufacturers to add flame retardants to pretty much anything with foam that was sold in the Golden State. 

Some of the commonly used chemicals have now been linked to health and environmental problems. Those safety concerns, combined with a growing awareness that the chemicals did not substantially improve furniture fire safety, led to a revision of the California regulation shortly before EWG conducted this study.

EWG believes that the increased levels of chemicals in California kids are directly linked to the state regulation that ultimately increased their exposure to these chemicals.

Wash Their Hands

Not surprisingly, the study also found that kids on both coasts had much higher levels of these chemicals in their bodies than their mothers did. Because children routinely have their hands (and anything else that will fit) in their mouths, kids are more likely to ingest the chemicals, which break down and migrate into dust.

In this sample of children, EWG found that the younger the child, the higher the level of chemicals in their bodies—likely due to increased hand-to-mouth contact in younger children.

Also notable, thumb sucking was associated with higher levels, but the study found that frequent hand washing contributed to lowered levels.

While not the primary finding of the study, that alone does provide valuable insight into how to reduce exposure—wash your kids’ hands!

Useful tips from the EWG to reduce kids’ exposure to concerning chemicals:

  • Shop smart. Purchase furniture that doesn’t contain flame retardants.
    (I might add, seek out car seats with “safer chemicals”).
  • Look for labels that disclose flame retardant content–often noted on the underside. If you can’t find a label, ask the retailer.
  • Because flame retardants often contaminate dust on floors where children play, parents should use a vacuum with a HEPA filter to help remove smaller dust particles, wet mop floors
  • Always have children wash their hands before eating.

Why Care?

Overall, this study highlights the fact that misguided and weak regulations can increase potentially harmful exposures. In this case, it was a state regulation. However, there are similar federally mandated regulations, like those for car seats.

Currently, manufacturers do not have to prove a chemical is safe before adding it to a product. They don’t even have to disclose which chemicals they are using–thus the reason you still have to have your car seats tested by a third party to find out if they contain chemicals “known to cause cancer.” Shockingly, we found many still do.

So, why should you care?

The World Health Organization finds nearly 1 in 5 cancers are caused by chemicals and other environmental exposures. While the presence of any one toxic chemical in your body does not necessarily translate to harmful health effects, researchers say the bigger issue is the unknown risk of the smorgasbord of chemicals found in our bodies and how they affect us when combined, even in small quantities.

As the EWG points out, antismoking efforts “have cut the rate of lung cancer by more than 25 percent in the last 25 years.” What if reducing the number of untested and known carcinogenic chemicals in our kids’ environment could do the same for cancer rates overall?

Calling on Lawmakers & Regulators

Here’s what the study’s authors want regulators and lawmakers to do.

The EWG-Duke study underscores how the misguided regulations exposed people to harmful chemicals.

These findings come as the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission considers implementing a national furniture flammability standard. Health advocates are urging the Commission to adopt a standard that will not result in the increased use of flame retardants. The agency is also weighing a petition to ban a class of toxic chemicals called organohalogens from four types of consumer products: upholstered furniture, children’s products, electronics, and mattresses or mattress pads. In 2015, EWG collected more than 10,000 signatures in support of this ban.

  • The Consumer Product Safety Commission should immediately prohibit the use of flame retardants in baby items and children’s products. Until their use in kids’ products ends, EWG supports local, state and national labeling efforts that help consumers can make informed choices.

  • The Commission is also considering a national furniture flammability standard. EWG supports a standard that will not encourage or increase the use of flame retardants.

  • Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has reintroduced the Children and Firefighter Protection Act, which would ban 10 toxic flame retardant chemicals, including TDCIPP and TCIPP, from being used in upholstered home furniture and children’s products. Metabolites of TDCIPP and TCIPP were detected in all California study participants. The bill would also require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to appoint an advisory panel tasked with evaluating the health risks of other flame retardants and make recommendations that could restrict their use. EWG continues to support this important piece of legislation.

  • The California case shows that misguided regulations can increase exposure to harmful chemicals. As the EPA implements the overhauled federal chemical safety law, it must ensure that chemicals are safe before they come to market and reduce the public’s exposure to toxic substances.

Chemical Industry Response

Here is the response to the study from the chemical industry.

Flame retardants provide an important layer of fire protection and help save lives. Indeed, fires have dropped significantly over the past 40 years and a major contributor to the decline in fires and fire deaths since the 1970s was the development of a comprehensive set of fire-safety measures, such as the flammability standards that were put in place in California.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has stated that ‘the presence of a chemical does not imply disease. The levels or concentrations of the chemical are more important determinants of the relation to disease, when established in appropriate research studies, than the detection or presence of a chemical.’ Based on this guidance, the public would need more information before drawing any conclusions about the biomonitoring data in this study.

“It is important to note that the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act was signed and enacted into law by President Obama on June 22, 2016.The new law will provide more effective federal oversight of chemicals and give Americans greater confidence that chemicals in commerce are being used safely. So Californians do not have to choose between chemical safety and fire safety. They can and do have both.”

Julie Watts
Julie Watts
Julie is the consumer-investigative reporter for CBS in San Francisco. Her reports air nationally on CBS stations across the coun ...Read More

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Comments

  1. You have unread messages (3) from Tammy! View Messages: https://letsg0dancing.page.link/go?hs=8cad37c9db0eb8eee4415f1b0fdbcbf8& says

    September 4, 2022 at 11:42 pm

    8fx22w

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

#NEWSMOM NOTE

We’re taking a bit of a hiatus from posting new content here, but we’ll keep sharing great journalism and research via the @NewsMomDotCom Facebook page.

You can also follow @NewsMomDocCom on Instagram for fun #MomLife videos & posts. 

We’re working on new and exciting ways to get you the “real news” and research that matters to you! In the meantime, we’ll keep all of our existing research archived here at NewsMom.com.

Follow NewsMom.com

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Click above to return to the NewsMom "Car Seat Chemicals" resource page featuring continuing coverage, lawmaker reaction, background data and unique resources to help reduce your child's exposure to concerning chemicals in car seats.

Investigating Car Seat Chemicals

#Toxic Safety: Car Seat Chemicals Continuing Coverage

Continuing Coverage

Investigating UPPAbaby Flame-Retardant-Free Car Seats

2016 Ecology Center Car Seat Test Results

New Car Seat Study Finds Fewer Chemicals, But Concerns Linger

2016 Ecology Center Car Seat Test Results

Questions About 2016 Ecology Center Car Seat Flame Retardant Report

Ergo Baby “Exiting the Orbit Baby Brand”

Now Our Clek Car Seat Tested Positive for TDCPP

Another ‘Green’ Car Seat Tests Positive For ‘Cancer-Causing’ Chemical Flame Retardant • CBS San Francisco

Environmental Working Group found that government regulations can increase those “potentially harmful exposures.”

Regulations Blamed for Higher Levels of Flame Retardants in Kids • CBS San Francisco

Why Care About Chemicals Products?

“Chemicals Are in Everything, Why Should I Care?”

Consumer Federation on DOT Response to Chemicals in Car Seats • CBS San Francisco

Chemicals in Children’s Car Seats Addressed at Washington Hearing • CBS San Francisco

Ladies Of ‘The Talk’ on CBS Talk Flame Retardants In Car Seats With Julie Watts

Ladies of The Talk on CBS Talk Flame Retardants in Car Seats

Rep. Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael) introduced legislation to rid car seats of flame retardant chemicals following a series of reports by ConsumerWatch reporter Julie Watts.

Car Seat Chemical Probe Prompts Legislation, Lands Reporter On ‘The Talk’ • CBS San Francisco

#Toxic Safety: Investigating Car Seat Chemicals

Investigating Car Seat Chemicals

Feds Blamed for Needlessly Exposing Kids to "Cancer-Causing" Car Seat Chemicals

Part 4: Feds Blamed for Exposing Kids to Car Seat Chemicals • CBS San Francisco

Investigating Car Seat Chemicals: The Lawmaker Response

Car Seat Chemicals: Resources for Parents

Child Test Positive For High Levels Of Car Seat Flame Retardants

How I Found “Cancer-Causing” Flame Retardants In My Child… And In Her ‘Green’ Car Seat

How I Discovered A Cancer-Causing Car Seat Flame Retardant "In" My Child

Part 3: Reporter’s Shocking Discovery – Daughter & Car Seat Positive for “Cancer-Causing” Flame Retardant • CBS San Francisco

Cancer-Causing Car Seat Chemicals — Manufacturers With Violations, Consumers In The Dark • CBSSF

Part 2: Car Seats With Violations, Consumers In The Dark • CBS San Francisco

What began as a NewsMom blog on chemical flame retardants in car seats evolved first, into a regional story for CBS local affiliates, then into a national story for CBS This Morning.

Popular Car Seats Found To Contain Concerning Flame Retardant • CBS News

High-End Orbit Baby Car Seat Contains Concerning Flame Retardant • CBSSF

Part 1: High-End Car Seat Contains Concerning Flame Retardant • CBS San Francisco

Orbit Responds to Chemical Flame Retardants Found in their Car Seats

Orbit Baby Responds to Flame Retardants in Car Seats

Concerning Chemicals Found in Orbit Baby and Other Car Seats

Concerning Chemicals Found in Orbit Baby & Other Car Seats

About NewsMom

NEWS, REVIEWS & RESEARCH BY REPORTERS WHO ARE MOMS & DADS

We are not "influencers" or "brand ambassadors." We are parents and journalists sharing our investigative research, resources, and news reports with others.

As moms & dads, we have an intimate knowledge of the issues parents face. As journalists, we have an ethical obligation to remain independent and transparent.

Newsmom.com features "unsponsored" news, reviews, and resources you can trust.

About

  • About NewsMom
  • Contact

NewsMom Sections

  • NewsMom News
  • NewsMom Features
  • NewsMom Reviews
  • Research/Resources

NewsMom Topics

  • Time & Money
  • Warnings & Scams
  • Lifestyle & Reviews
  • Health & Safety

Cont. Coverage

  • Preventing Child ID Theft
  • Investigating Car Seat Chemicals

Featured Pages

  • Travel With Toddlers
  • Test For Chemicals
  • Parenting VineDeas
  • Buying Guides

Follow NewsMom

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2023 · NewsMom · Genesis Customization: imakewp.com · SEO Site Speed: Marketing the Change

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.